Paper #2 Rhetorical Analysis
Rhetoric by definition means “the art of effective or persuasive speaking or
writing, especially the use of figures of speech and other compositional
techniques”. Inherent in the definition the goal of the author
is to persuade. Ways to accomplish persuasion are to appeal to human values.
While these very values are subject to individuals bias there are overarching
approaches that are more or less effective based on the individual. Ethos is an appeal to ethics, and it is a
means of convincing someone that they can be trusted based on their character and
reputation. Pathos is an appeal to emotion, and is a way
of convincing an audience through raising an emotional response while Logos is an appeal to logic. These tools are
used in literary settings to argue a point.
I have chosen a post from the president of the United States,
Donald Trump. Based on his personal preferences Trump chooses to utilize the
social media site “Twitter” for both personal and political posts. The platform
Twitter has a character limit of 140 per post. The character limit effects the
way the platform is used. Being limited to 140 characters means that this
platform doesn’t have the utility that a book or a blog provides due to the
limiting of space. This limit its safe to say forces the user to condense their
posts and makes the focus on diction even greater if they are attempting to
argue a point that would require more that the allotted space. This point is
exceedingly valid by pointing out that while a book or other non-character
restricted platform allows the benefit of infinite space to the author in which
they could use to construct an effective Ethos, Pathos or Logos oriented argument.
The post is as follows ““One of the most effective
press conferences I've ever seen!" says Rush Limbaugh. Many agree. Yet
FAKE MEDIA calls it differently! Dishonest”. This post by President Donald
Trump came in response to public and media testimonies that his speech on 17 Feb 2017 was for lack of a better term “bad”. There
are multiple levels on which this particular post can be dissected and due to
Trumps Emphasis on the “FAKE MEDIA” I will also have to provide context to this
accusation, while the context is still on his twitter account it is however on
a separate twitter post which I will also provide a link to. To begin Donald
Trump Quotes Rush Limbaugh and his opinion on his speech in response to the
accusations. In the sphere of politics Rush Limbaugh summarized is a conservative political commentator who works on Fox News (also
known to be of conservative leaning) and who’s party alignment coincides with
Trump’s own. This is telling in who the audience of this tweet. Rush Limbaugh
is a very well-known and respected figure in republican media and as such his
opinion would hold significant weight with those who agree with him and have
developed a following so the target audience is republicans. This is a tactical
move on Trumps part, by actively including Rush Limbaugh he is using his
reputation to solidify his own while appealing to their Republican audience!
This is a direct example of ethos use.
Donald Trump in the first half of his point defends his speech and
himself as I’ve argued and for the second half he employs an Ad Hominem attack
on the “FAKE MEDIA”. To build on that first we must look at what an Ad Hominem
attacks is. An ad hominem attack is a
logical fallacy in which
an argument is diverted or ignored by attacking the character, motive, or other
attribute of the “person” making the argument, or persons associated with the
argument, rather than attacking the meat of the argument itself.
President Donald Trump employs this attack to discredit the news outlets
involved in covering the negative response to his speech. By employing ad hominem,
he discredits them by attempting to call into question their bias and
truthfulness. By doing this he can if his argument is accepted invalidate the
criticism towards him while turning the tables and being the attacker himself.
Quote Analyzed
Context
to “FAKE NEWS”
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/832708293516632065
I felt the third paragraph had some of your strongest points, because you used really good information to describe what was going on in this post. For instance showing how the use of a mans name will help save Donald Trump's reputation while he still has it. For me the conclusion wasn't as strong as everything else, I would have like something to sum it all up, but it kind of ended abruptly.
ReplyDeleteHi Dave,
ReplyDeletelike I mentioned in your last paper, your style can be great improved by looking for those short choppy sentences and learning how to combine them. I would take advantage of the online writing center to help you combine sentences effectively to allow you to transition a bit more smoothly.
I would also recommend reorganizing your paper, as it seems to take a while to get to the analysis. We will cover an effective outline in class on Friday. I appreciate that you found a fallacy.